Index: openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/display_types.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/display_types.html,v
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/display_types.html 21 Jul 2004 16:02:49 -0000 1.3
+++ openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/display_types.html 9 Dec 2004 11:09:16 -0000 1.4
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
graphic pertaining to the Item Display Types system is available there
also.
-
- - Branch by question. This kind of branch depends on previous
+
- Branch by question. This kind of
+branch depends on previous
answers. A table of all multiple choice / boolean questions will be
given to the creator along with their possible answers.
- Each question has a checkbox to determine if this question
shall be included in this branch condition and a radio button, if all
answers or just one have to be given (e.g. if we have multiple correct
answers, we might want to branch into this section all answers have
-been selected by the respondee or just one).
-
+been selected by the respondee or just one).
- The answers have checkboxes, with the correct answers checked
by default for multiple choice question. All other questions will only
be displayed if they give a percentage value to the answer. In this
case a textfield is given with the possibility to give a range (10-100)
-or seperate percentages (10, 100, 200).
-
+or seperate percentages (10, 100, 200).
- The display of this section depends on whether the valid
answers have been given to all or just one of the questions that have
been checked (as you might have guessed, we need a radio button for
-this below the table).
-
+this below the table).
Questions that will be displayed depend on the position of the section.
Only questions that could have been answered in the assessment before
-this section is displayed will be shown.
-
- Branch by result. Instead of relying on one or multiple answers
+this section is displayed will be shown.
+ Branch by result. Instead of
+relying on one or multiple answers
we check for a result in a previous section. This can only work in a
test environment (so don't display this option if we are not dealing
with a test).
- Section: select. This will display a list of all previous
-sections. The selected section will be used for the computation.
-
+sections. The selected section will be used for the computation.
Calculation: select (median, distractor, absolut number of
points). What shall be computed to determine whether the user is
-allowed to see this section.
-
+allowed to see this section.
From / To value: integer. Two fields to display the valid
-range for which this section will be displayed to the user.
-
+range for which this section will be displayed to the user.
- It is imagineable that a combination of both methods makes sense,
-so we should take this into account when creating the UI.
-
+ It is imagineable that a
+combination of both methods makes sense,
+so we should take this into account when creating the UI.
-
-Order of creation: sections and questions
-Requiring the questions to be written first
-before the sections are created by selecting and "inserting" the
-questions into the section is reasonable. But it would also be very
-useful to be able to import entire sections from other assessments into
-a new assessment. In clinical trials, there are sets of questions that
-show up in many forms, and it shouldn't be necessary to recreate these
-sets every time a new assessment is being designed.
-I think that the data model should provide catalogues of all levels
-of the hierarchical assessment structures to support, say, inserting
-one entire assessment into the middle of another. This seems like a
-generalization of the mechanism you suggest here.
--- Stan Kaufman
-on November 18, 2003 05:19 PM (view
-details)
-Branch conditions
-It seems to me that there are two types of branch conditions:
-
+
-The datamodel and UI must thus support creating and processing a) these
-criteria; and b) the paths. This seems more or less to be what you've
-said, I think.
-
-