Index: openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.html,v
diff -u -r1.6 -r1.7
--- openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.html	4 Aug 2018 09:34:07 -0000	1.6
+++ openacs-4/packages/assessment/www/doc/requirements.html	3 Sep 2024 15:37:35 -0000	1.7
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
 Last but not least, the assessment tool should be able to provide it's
 information gathering features to other packages within the OpenACS
 framework as well.
-<p>It is very important to note, that not all parameters and features
+<p>It is very important to note that not all parameters and features
 mentioned in this use case should be displayed to the user at all
 times. Depending on the use case, a good guess with pre determined
 parameters should be made for the user (e.g. no need to let the user
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
 native English speakers. This is why they want to add additional
 translations to the questions to broaden the response base. For
 consistency, the assessment may only be shown to the subject if all
-questions used have been translated. Furthermore it is necessary to
+questions used have been translated. Furthermore, it is necessary to
 store the language used along with the response (as a translation might
 not be as good as the original).
 <h4>The poll</h4>
@@ -239,11 +239,11 @@
 exam consists of 3 sections. The exam is passed, if the student
 achieves at least 50% total score. In addition the student has to
 achieve at least 40% in each of the sections. The first section is
-deemed more important, therefore it gets a weight of 40%, the other two
+deemed more important, therefore, it gets a weight of 40%, the other two
 sections only 30% towards the total score. Each section consists of
 multiple questions that have a different weight (in percent) for the
 total score of the section. The sum of the weights has to be 100%,
-otherwise the author of the section get's a warning. Some of the
+otherwise the author of the section gets a warning. Some of the
 questions are multiple choice questions, that get different percentages
 for each answer. As the computer science department wants to discourage
 students from giving wrong answers, some wrong answers have a negative
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@
 Assessment or set of Assessments to a specific set of subjects,
 students or other data entry personnel. These actions potentially will
 involve interfacing with other Workflow management tools (e.g. an
-"Enrollment" package that would handle creation of new Parties (a.k.a.
+"Enrollment" package that would handle creation of new Parties (aka
 clinical trial subjects) in the database.
 </p>
 <p>Schedulers could also be teachers, curriculum designers, site
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@
 datum, when, whether it is a correct value, whether anyone has looked
 at it or edited it and when, etc etc...)
 </p>
-<p>Staff could be site coordinators in clinical trials, insurance
+<p>Staff could be site coordinators in clinical trials, ensurance
 adjustors, accountants, tax preparation staff, etc.
 </p>
 <h2>System / Application Overview<br>
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@
       <li> Whether anonymous Subjects are allowed </li>
       <li> Text of email to Subjects to Invite, Remind and Thank them
 for performing Assessment </li>
-      <li> Text of email to Staff to Instuct, Remind and Thank them for
+      <li> Text of email to Staff to Instruct, Remind and Thank them for
 performing Assessment on a Subject </li>
     </ul>
     <p> </p>