In this document, we'll examine the user interface pages of the Notes application in more detail, covering two separate aspects of page development in OpenACS. First, we'll talk about the code needed to make your pages aware of which application instance they are running in. Second, we'll talk about using the form builder to develop form-based user interfaces in OpenACS. While these seem like unrelated topics, they both come up in the example page that we are going to look at, so it makes sense to address them at the same time.

As you will recall from the packages tutorial, the Request Processor (RP) and Package Manager (APM) allow site administrators to define an arbitrary mapping from URLs in the site to objects representing content. These objects may represent single files, or entire applications. The APM uses the site map to map application instances to particular URLs within a site. We call creating such a mapping mounting the application instance at a particular URL. The tutorial also showed how a given URL is translated into a physical file to serve using the site map. We'll repeat this description here, assuming that you have mounted an instance of Notes at the URL /notes as we did in the packages-example:

What is missing from this description is a critical fact for application developers: In addition to working out what file to serve, the RP also stores information about which package instance the file belongs to into the AOLserver connection environment. The following ad_conn interfaces can be used to extract this information:

In the Notes example, we are particularly interested in the package_id field. If you study the data model and code, you'll see why. As we said before in the data modeling tutorial, the Notes application points the context_id of each Note object that it creates to the package instance that created it. That is, the context_id corresponds exactly to the package_id that comes in from the RP. This is convenient because it allows the administrator and the owner of the package to easily define access control policies for all the notes in a particular instance just my setting permissions on the package instance itself.

The code for adding and editing notes, in notes/www/add-edit.tcl, shows how this works. At the top of the page, we extract the package_id and use it to do permission checks:

set package_id [ad_conn package_id]

if {[info exists note_id]} {
  ad_require_permission $note_id write

  set context_bar [ad_context_bar "Edit Note"]
} else {
  ad_require_permission $package_id create

  set context_bar [ad_context_bar "New Note"]
}

This code figures out whether we are editing an existing note or creating a new one. It then ensures that we have the right privileges for each action.

Later, when we actually create a note, the SQL that we run ensures that the context_id is set the right way:

db_dml new_note {
  declare
    id integer;
  begin
    id := note.new(
      owner_id => :user_id,
      title => :title,
      body => :body,
      creation_user => :user_id,
      creation_ip => :peeraddr,
      context_id => :package_id
    );
  end;
}

The rest of this page makes calls to the form builder part of the template system. This API allows you to write forms-based pages without generating a lot of duplicated HTML in your pages. It also encapsulates most of the common logic that we use in dealing with forms, which we'll discuss next.

The forms API is pretty simple: You use calls in the template::form namespace in your Tcl script to create form elements. The final template page then picks this stuff up and lays the form out for the user. The form is set up to route submit buttons and whatnot back to the same Tcl script that set up the form, so your Tcl script will also contain the logic needed to process these requests.

So, given this outline, here is a breakdown of how the forms code works in the add-edit.tcl page. First, we create a form object called new_note:

template::form create new_note

All the forms related code in this page will refer back to this object. In addition, the adp part of this page does nothing but display the form object:

<master>

@context_bar@

<hr>

<center>
<formtemplate id="new_note"></formtemplate>
</center>

The next thing that the Tcl page does is populate the form with form elements. This code comes first:

if {[template::form is_request new_note] && [info exists note_id]} {

  template::element create new_note note_id \
      -widget hidden \
      -datatype number \
      -value $note_id

  db_1row note_select {
    select title, body
    from notes
    where note_id = :note_id
  }
}

The if_request call returns true if we are asking the page to render the form for the first time. That is, we are rendering the form to ask the user for input. The tcl part of a form page can be called in 3 different states: the initial request, the initial submission, and the validated submission. These states reflect the typical logic of a forms based page in OpenACS:

The rest of the if condition figures out if we are creating a new note or editing an existing note. If note_id is passed to us from the calling page, we assume that we are editing an existing note. In this case, we do a database query to grab the data for the note so we can populate the form with it.

The next two calls create form elements where the user can insert or edit the title and body of the Note. The interface to template::element is pretty straightforward.

Finally, the code at the bottom of the page performs the actual database updates when the form is submitted and validated:

if [template::form is_valid new_note] {
  set user_id [ad_conn user_id]
  set peeraddr [ad_conn peeraddr]

  if [info exists note_id] {
    db_dml note_update {
      update notes
      set title = :title,
          body = :body
      where note_id = :note_id
    }
  } else {
    db_dml new_note {
      declare
        id integer;
      begin
        id := note.new(
          owner_id => :user_id,
          title => :title,
          body => :body,
          creation_user => :user_id,
          creation_ip => :peeraddr,
          context_id => :package_id
        );
      end;
    }
  }

  ad_returnredirect "."
}

In this simple example, we don't do any custom validation. The nice thing about using this API is that the forms library handles all of the HTML rendering, input validation and database transaction logic on your behalf. This means that you can write pages without duplicating all of that code in every set of pages that uses forms.

To watch all of this work, use the installer to update the Notes package with the new code that you grabbed out of CVS or the package repository, mount an instance of Notes somewhere in your server and then try out the user interface pages. It should become clear that in a real site, you would be able to, say, create a custom instance of Notes for every registered user, mount that instance at the user's home page, and set up the permissions so that the instance is only visible to that user. The end result is a site where users can come and write notes to themselves.

This is a good example of the leverage available in the OpenACS 5.0.0rc1 system. The code that we have written for Notes is not at all more complex than a similar application without access control or site map awareness. By adding a small amount of code, we have taken a small, simple, and special purpose application to something that has the potential to be a very useful, general-purpose tool, complete with multi-user features, access control, and centralized administration.

In OpenACS 5.0.0rc1, application pages and scripts can be aware of the package instance, or subsite in which they are executing. This is a powerful general purpose mechanism that can be used to structure web services in very flexible ways.

We saw how to use this mechanism in the Notes application and how it makes it possible to easily turn Notes into an application that appears to provide each user in a system with their own private notes database.

We also saw how to use the templating system's forms API in a simple way, to create forms based pages with minimal duplication of code.